Branding, Branding, Brand-Ing? :: MSN Fails To Keep It Straight

Business Article Directory, Get Free Reprint Articles and Business Content for your site with
article directory
54866 *recent articles in 509 categories Last article added 11/15/07
 
Article Categories
 
Reviews
 
Site Menu
 
Site Search


 
ArticlePros.com » Business » Branding » Branding, Branding, Brand-Ing? :: MSN Fails To Keep It Straight

  • Date: 2006-02-26
  • Author: Rob Sullivan1
  • All articles by this author
  • Branding, Branding, Brand-Ing? :: MSN Fails To Keep It Straight


    Related Branding Articles

         Sometimes you see promotions come along and you wonder ? did they just do that? The current MSN promotion ? msnsearchandwin is a prime example of this.

    Not only do they use ?black hat? or at least "questionable? tactics on the site, but the messaging is inconsistent.

    In this article I look at the new MSN promotion and ask the question: Why bother?

    By now you?ve probably heard about the new MSN promotion where you can win prizes simply by using MSN search.

    They did do something right by registering a domain name that implies that message. If you go to http://www.msnsearchandwin.com/ you will see the familiar MSN search box.

    Wait a minute...Why is this search box blue? Didn?t MSN just rebrand with a nicer, cleaner silver grey look?

    That, my friends, is mistake number one. It?s as if the technical team and the marketing team didn?t get together to discuss this program.

    I mean, when you go through something as complex and massive as a rebranding, you should make sure the messaging is consistent across the various media. Especially when the promotion and the rebranding launch within days of each other.

    This is eerily similar to the article I wrote about Superbowl Ads: http://www.textlinkbrokers.com/blogs/comments/329_0_1_0_C/. In that article I talked about how advertisers spend millions on a 30 second or 1 minute TV commercial yet they fail to carry that messaging over onto their website effectively if at all.

    And here we have MSN ? probably one of the most recognized brands on the web and subsidiary to the company with one of the most effective and ruthless marketing arms in the world ? and it can?t seem to communicate it?s message that MSN is rebranding.

    I mean, how hard would it have been for someone in Tech to phone up someone in Marketing and say, ?By the way, you know that search and win promotion you are doing? Be sure that the colors match the new look of MSN that?s launching in a few days.?

    But wait, it gets better.

    First spotted by http://www.kerrydean.com/blog/, if you view source of the msnsearchandwin home page what do you see?

    That?s right, about a million keywords stuffed into the keywords tag. (OK maybe not a million but there are 256 keywords in the meta keywords tag).

    It gets worse. Immediately below the overstuffed keywords tag you will see a bunch of keywords stuffed into a comments tag. Again the same 256 words used in the meta keywords tag.

    So tell me, is it OK for a search engine to spam itself?

    Perhaps we could all learn a little something from MSN's marketing mistake: Keep it consistent!

    More articles from this pro: http://www.ArticlePros.com/author.php?Rob Sullivan1


    More on Business and Branding can be found here.
     

    Get this article to go

    RSS | JScript | Email | HTML

     

    About the author

    Rob Sullivan is a SEO Consultant and Writer for <a href="http://www.textlinkbrokers.com">http://www.textlinkbrokers.com</a>. Textlinkbrokers is a <a href="http://www.textlinkbrokers.com">link building</a> company. Please provide a link directly to Textlinkbrokers when syndicating this article.

     
    Email options
       

    ** Check all that apply **

     

    This article has been accessed 564 times since 2006-02-26.


    Home  •  Search  •  Add Your Own Article  •  RSS feeds  •  JavaScript Feeds  •   •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
    Disclaimer: The information presented and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors
    and do not necessarily represent the views of ArticlePros.com and/or its partners.
    Copyright ArticlePros.com © 2005. All Rights Reserved